09-05-20 by Spotlight Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe government’s Global Compensation Deed: Response to ministers’ joint statement and resulting media confusion


SADC Tribunal Rights Watch

3 September 2020

Zimbabwe’s ministers of land and finance issued a joint statement on the farm compensation issue on 31 August 2020, a month after the controversial signing of the Global Compensation Deed between the government and two farming organisations on 29 July 2020.

The statement’s purported objective was to clarify the situation with regards to land tenure and compensation since there is a high degree of confusion, both locally and internationally, with regards to the agreement and the actual legality of the “deed”. However, the arrangements continue to remain opaque and are cause for mounting concern.

There are three categories of former farmers listed in Zimbabwe’s Constitution of 2013, which itself has a number of anomalies and contradictory clauses.

  • “Non-indigenous” farmers, i.e. white farmers, even though many were third and fourth generation farmers who were totally committed to their country, had been given title to their land and had invested extensively. Furthermore, most of the farms had been purchased after independence in 1980 and had been issued with certificates of “no present interest” by the government, confirming that the government had no interest in their land for resettlement. There were approximately 4,500 commercial farmers on the land prior to 2000 when the farm invasions began. According to the constitution, they are only entitled to compensation for “improvements” on their farms and not for the land.


  • “Indigenous” Zimbabweans or black Zimbabweans, although the constitution avoids clarifying this racial distinction. The government has recently claimed that 440 indigenous-owned farms were “acquired” during fast-track land reform although no lists have been made available for public scrutiny. According to the constitution, they are entitled to compensation for both improvements and for the land.


  • “Foreign” farmers whose land ownership rights were covered under bilateral agreements signed by Zimbabwe with other countries. According to the constitution, they are entitled to compensation for both improvements and for the land.


Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreements/Bilateral Investment Treaties

Foreign nationals whose countries signed bilateral investment treaties (BIPPAs and BITs) with Zimbabwe include primarily Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Denmark. Contrary to reports in the media, no bilateral investment treaty was ever signed with Britain.


These BIPPA and BIT properties, following high profile international court cases, have been now been categorised as being “protected” and their owners are theoretically able to claim back their land which was nationalised.


However, the fact remains that many of the invasions and take-overs of these BIPPA and BIT farms – as well as numerous other commercial farms across Zimbabwe – were executed with extreme brutality, causing severe injuries and in some cases costing the lives of farmers and their workers.


According to international law, compensation for moral damages can also apply. In the von Pezold case, which was taken to the International Centre for Settlement Disputes (ICSID), which is part of the World Bank Group, the ICSID Tribunal found in 2015 that the “settlers” (invaders) had kidnapped, threatened, and physically attacked the claimants and their employees.
The ICSID Tribunal held that, even if the Zimbabwe government was not directly responsible for these attacks, the failure of the police to prevent them over the course of several years would fall short of a state’s obligation to provide full protection under the law.
No assurances regarding restoration of property rights

The ministers’ joint statement does not give any concrete assurance regarding restoration of property rights – or change anything materially to bring investment and production in the agricultural sector, which is in increasingly dire straits.


The United Nations warns that by December 2020, 10 million of Zimbabwe’s estimated 14 million population will require food aid to avoid starvation. Zimbabwe has been reliant on imports and international food aid since 2001, the year after the farm invasions began.

Furthermore, here is nothing in this statement which brings confidence that government will restore the rule of law, notably in respect of land title, unless white farmers, who were born in the country and have Zimbabwean passports, are correctly re-categorised as “indigenous” according to the internationally accepted definition.


International Court Judgments/SADC Tribunal

Another key issue of contention is the fact that the government is still failing to comply with the judgment of the regional human rights court, the Southern African Development Community’s SADC Tribunal, in the Campbell case judgment of November 2008.
The Tribunal ruled in the Campbell case – Mike Campbell (Pvt) Ltd et al v. Republic of Zimbabwe -that the government violated the organisation’s treaty by denying access to the courts and engaging in racial discrimination in the confiscation of land in the “land reform” programme in Zimbabwe.
Despite a statement by the minister of lands in 2016 that the fast-track land reform programme was over, farmers continue to be harassed and criminalised for the “crime” of farming.

One farmer known to SADC Tribunal Rights Watch has so far been in and out of court on 136 occasions regarding his precarious tenure on his farm. He, like many others, still has a jail sentence hanging over him for committing the “crime” of farming and producing food for the country.
The reality of the land reform programme in the 2000s was that it was “politically expedient at a time when Mugabe and his ZANU PF party were facing an unprecedented threat from the [newly formed] Movement for Democratic Change party” as opposed to the “colonial imbalances” narrative.


The US$3.5 billion compensation figure

Although the two farming organisations agreed to a significantly reduced compensation figure of US3.5 billion for improvements for the group of largely white dispossessed commercial farmers, it is important to note that the Zimbabwean government is broke and this money still has to be raised within the sceptical international community.

International lending organisations are monitoring with mounting concern the widely reported gross human rights abuses being perpetrated by the government through its armed forces, its failure to respect the rule of law and property rights, as well as the ongoing high levels of government corruption.

Given this bleak scenario, SADC Tribunal Rights Watch does not believe that money will be released from any of the major financial institutions, added to which is the fact that Zimbabwe’s outstanding foreign debt exceeds US$8billion.

So long as laws and policies in Zimbabwe remain racial and hostile to property rights and agricultural investment – and remain in contempt of the SADC Tribunal Campbell case judgment, we will continue to see hunger and economic regression in this once thriving African state.

Funds to encourage a productive and prosperous agricultural sector are only likely to be made available once the rule of law, justice and property rights have been restored, the frequently brutal farm grabs and farm attacks have ceased, and all farmers, both black and white, are encouraged back to farm in a secure, investment-friendly environment.

Lastly, the statement reported in various media that the United States has said that compensating farmers is one of the requirements for lifting sanctions is misleading. The US will assist Zimbabwe to develop if there is adherence to property rights and respect for the rule of law – specifically landmark judgments like that of the SADC Tribunal.

The US will not pour money into helping to restore the economy and agriculture if the fundamentals are not in place according to the Zimbabwe Democracy and Economic Recovery Act (ZDERA). Too often they have seen misguided aid that has simply cemented dictators in their positions of power and not grappled with the fundamental issues that are the root causes of poverty and collapse.

Ben Freeth
Spokesperson for SADC Tribunal Rights Watch, Zimbabwe

Posted in:

Join the discussion

Your email address will not be published.

Join the discussion

write a comment
  • Zanu PF all grabbed farms….they delivered the 380 000 Farm workers into destitution !
    Their own Zimbabwean people !
    They drove off Artisanal miners with dogs and helicopter Gunships then invited in the Chinese to loot the Marange Diamond fields into oblivion !
    We have 7500000 needing food aid and 95% unemployment and Zanu PF still think they had nothing to do with this catastrophe such is their level of intelligence !
    We have Zanu PF councillors who drive past us in U$ 400 000 Lamborghini SUV’s while We walk on potholed roads with no shoes !
    We have no currency and no food security and a Zanu PF excuse for every single failure since 1980 !

  • Zimbabwe is broke. Noone is going to compensate anybody, unless and until the black natives are the ones receiving compensation and reparations for land robbery and colonisation.

    • Mr Musatanga, why dont You ask the question ‘Why are We as a Nation broke ?’
      Could it be that We have a Government that has looted U$15 Billion in diamonds with the new colonisers China ?
      Could it be that We had a hateful evil Prime Minister who destroyed His own Agricultural Economy and parcelled out all those grabbed Farms to their friends and relatives and Party members and High Court Judges ? He didn’t give a damn about the 380 000 Farm workers cast into poverty and the 7500 000 now needing food aid and the 95% unemployment because our Industries which depended on those Farms also collapsed ?
      How is it that Mugabe died in Singapore a Billionaire ?
      How is it that Zanu PF members can charter private jets and have their Medical needs met outside Zimbabwe in Dubai, Singapore, China, India and South Africa while We ordinary Zimbabweans die on the floors and in the waiting rooms of those very Hospitals and Clinics ruined by Zanu PF ?
      How is it that We had lower Infant Mortality rate in Rhodesia under the Government of Ian Smith ?
      How is it that We have a lower life expectancy than Rhodesia under Ian Smith ?
      How is it that We have less potable water than Rhodesia under Ian Smith ?
      How is it that We have more Africans wallowing in absolute poverty than Rhodesia under Ian Smith ?
      How is it that We have less Hospitals and Clinics than Rhodesia under Ian Smith ?
      They cant even keep the lights ON !
      Tell me what was the point of our “Liberation” when We have been liberated into a more murderous bloody regime than the Rhodesians under Ian Smith ?
      Mugabe and Zanu PF have killed more innocent Zimbabweans than the Rhodesians did in their whole bush war !
      Say what You want about Rhodesians and Ian Smith but the facts are that Zanu PF has caused far more misery than the Rhodesians and this is the real tragedy !
      You know something is very very wrong when the barbaric regime is removed only to be replaced with one that is far worse !
      Well done Mugabe….Well done Zanu PF …..40 Years….40 Years !